Your AWS infrastructure may be supporting your business today, but is it operating as efficiently, securely and reliably as it could? Over time, workloads change, resource requirements grow and infrastructure configurations evolve. Without regular architectural reviews, opportunities to improve performance, manage costs and strengthen operational practices can go unnoticed.
IconicKloud provides AWS Well-Architected Review services to help businesses assess their cloud infrastructure against AWS architectural best practices. By examining workloads, configurations and operational approaches, we help identify potential risks, inefficiencies and areas for improvement.
From reviewing resource utilisation and security considerations to evaluating reliability and performance, our approach helps you make more informed decisions about your AWS environment.
This pillar examines how workloads are operated, monitored and improved over time. The review considers operational processes, change management, automation and how teams respond to events.
Security considerations include access permissions, data protection, infrastructure controls and the ability to identify potential security events. The review helps highlight areas where existing security practices or configurations may need attention.
Reliability focuses on whether applications can perform their intended functions consistently. This includes considering failure scenarios, recovery arrangements, workload resilience and the ability to respond to changing demand.
This pillar examines how effectively computing resources are selected and used. It considers workload requirements, resource allocation, performance monitoring and opportunities to improve efficiency as demand changes.
Cloud spending should reflect actual workload requirements. The review considers resource utilisation, infrastructure choices, consumption patterns and potential areas of unnecessary expenditure.
Sustainability considers the environmental impact of running cloud workloads. It encourages efficient resource utilisation and architectural decisions that help reduce unnecessary resource consumption.
Establish the workloads being reviewed, their business purpose, infrastructure components and operational requirements. This provides context for evaluating architectural decisions.
Use the six pillars of the AWS Well-Architected Framework to examine relevant areas of the environment and identify potential risks or improvement opportunities.
Not every finding needs the same level of attention. Consider its potential business impact, technical complexity, urgency and the effort involved in addressing it.
Outline practical improvement opportunities based on the review findings. Recommendations may relate to cost management, security configurations, performance, reliability or operational practices.
Establish a suitable path for addressing the findings. Some improvements may involve configuration changes, while others may require architectural adjustments or further technical investigation.
Cloud environments continue to change. Periodic reviews can help businesses reassess workloads, understand the impact of previous improvements and identify new areas requiring attention.
Examine the overall design of your cloud environment, including its key components, workload dependencies and architectural decisions. Identify areas where the current design may benefit from improvement.
Review how AWS resources are being used in relation to workload requirements. Consider opportunities to right-size resources, improve utilisation and reduce unnecessary cloud expenditure.
Evaluate relevant security practices, including identity and access management, permissions, data protection and infrastructure configurations.
Consider whether the infrastructure supports current application demands and how it may respond to changing workloads. Identify potential performance limitations and opportunities for more suitable resource allocation.
Examine workload resilience, backup considerations, recovery arrangements and potential points of failure that could affect application availability.
Review how infrastructure changes are managed, how workloads are monitored and how operational issues are identified and addressed.
A review can help assess whether the migrated workloads are operating in line with relevant AWS best practices and identify opportunities for further optimisation.
If AWS expenditure is growing without a clear understanding of the reasons, a review can help examine resource usage, infrastructure choices and potential areas of unnecessary spending.
As workloads expand, existing architectural decisions may need to be reconsidered. Reviewing the environment can help identify performance, capacity and reliability considerations before further growth.
New applications, users and infrastructure components can introduce additional security considerations. A review can help identify areas where access controls, configurations and operational practices may need attention.
If you are planning to update applications, redesign workloads or adopt additional AWS services, a review can help inform those decisions.
An AWS environment should be assessed periodically rather than treated as a finished project. Regular reviews help businesses keep architectural decisions aligned with changing operational requirements.
An AWS Well-Architected Review is a structured assessment of an AWS workload against the best practices outlined in the AWS Well-Architected Framework. It examines areas such as security, reliability, performance efficiency, operational excellence, cost optimisation and sustainability to identify potential improvements.
A review can help your business identify architectural risks, understand infrastructure inefficiencies and find opportunities to improve cloud operations. It can also provide a clearer basis for future infrastructure and optimisation decisions.
The six pillars are operational excellence, security, reliability, performance efficiency, cost optimisation and sustainability. Together, they provide guidance for evaluating how AWS workloads are designed and operated.
A review can identify potential cost optimisation opportunities, such as underutilised resources, unsuitable resource configurations or unnecessary expenditure. Actual savings depend on the findings, the changes implemented and the workload requirements.
Security is one of the framework's six pillars. A review can examine relevant areas such as access permissions, data protection and infrastructure security configurations. However, it should not automatically be considered a complete penetration test, security audit or compliance certification.
The frequency depends on how frequently your workloads change, the complexity of your environment and your operational requirements. Reviews can be useful after significant architectural changes and as part of ongoing cloud optimisation.
The findings can be used to develop an improvement plan. This may include prioritising architectural changes, reviewing resource configurations, addressing security considerations and improving operational processes.
Not necessarily. A review evaluates the existing environment and identifies potential improvements. Any recommended changes should be assessed and planned separately according to their technical requirements and business impact.
Yes. Businesses of different sizes can benefit from reviewing their AWS workloads. The scope can be tailored to the complexity of the infrastructure and the areas the business wants to evaluate.